McDonald’s U.S. head says California fast-food bill unfairly targets big chains
California fast-food bill unfairly targets. The president of McDonald’s in the United States publicly attacked a historic California measure on Wednesday, saying it unjustly singles out large businesses when it comes to controlling fast-food workers’ wages.
The comments from McDonald’s U.S. President Joe Erlinger came after the California state Senate earlier this week passed a bill giving a 10-person committee the right to boost the industry’s minimum pay to as much as $22 an hour for chains with more than 100 outlets nationwide. The current minimum wage in California is $15.50 per hour. The council would also be able to impose safety restrictions.
The bill’s supporters assert that it will give fast-food workers more influence and contribute to the industry’s efforts to address issues like unsafe working conditions and wage theft. Which can include failing to compensate workers for overtime. However, the restaurant sector is strongly opposed to the FAST Act. Because it is worried about how it would affect California’s restaurants and how it will be seen by other states.
“It raises the costs for one kind of restaurant while sparing a different kind. That holds true even if the revenue and staff counts for those two businesses are identical, Erlinger wrote in a letter that was uploaded to the business’ website on Wednesday.
Supporters of the legislation claim
Supporters of the legislation claim that it will give fast-food employees more power and help the sector handle problems including unsafe working conditions and wage fraud. Which can include failing to pay employees for overtime. The restaurant industry, meanwhile, is adamantly opposed to the FAST Act. Because it is concerned about how it would impact California’s eateries and how other states will see it.
It increases the costs for one type of restaurant while preserving another. Erlinger stated such in a letter that was posted on the company website on Wednesday. Even if the revenue and employee count for those two companies were the same.